- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1011 WP No. 8371 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 8371 OF 2019 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. VIDYA WIFE OF SHRI. N. LOKESH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, (PROPRIETOR) SRI. VENKATESHWARA TEA STALL, NORTH SIDE IN RED CROSS BHAVAN, ASHOKA ROAD, TUMAKURU - 572 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNA NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE TUMAKURU - 572 101. 2. THE ASSISTNAT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TUMAKURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE TUMAKURU - 572 101. 3. THE HEALTH OFFICER TUMAKURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE TUMAKURU - 572 101. 4. VINAY H.V S/O VASANTHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS (AUTHORISED DEALER SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.) SHOP NO. 101 TO 103 AND 142 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1011 WP No. 8371 of 2019 INDIAN RED CROSS BHAVAN ASHOKA ROAD, CHURCH CIRCLE, TUMAKURU - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUBRAMANYA R, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3; SRI. M. NARAYANA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE/DIRECTION DATED 12.02.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-2 TO THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: (a) Call for records; (b) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction quashing the notice/direction dated 12-02- 2019 issued by the 2nd respondent in No: TMP/TS/CR-86/2018-19 to the petitioner Annexure A. (c) Direct the Respondents to pay the cost of these proceedings; (d) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may "eem appropriate in the circumstances of the case, to meet the ends of Justice. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1011 WP No. 8371 of 2019 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The said memo reads as follows: "The Advocate for the Petitioner requesting this Hon'ble Court may kindly to withdraw the above case as infructuous in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Accepting the said memo and the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34