SIRAJ HUSSAIN SON OF SHRI MOHD. IBRAHIM v. HEADMASTER
WRES/108/2026 · 2026-03-18
Bipin Gupta
Review Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4640 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4640 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11452] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 108/2026 Siraj Hussain Son Of Shri Mohd. Ibrahim, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Harish Chandra Mathur Lok Prasasan Sansthan, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner/Applicant Versus 1 Headmaster, Government Moineya Islamiya Higher Secondary School, Ajmer (Raj.) 2 First Appellate Authority, District Education Officer, Ajmer (Raj.) 3 Rajasthan Information Commission, Behind OTS Campus, Jhalana Link Road, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Registrar And Officer-On-Special Duty. ----Respondents/Non Applicants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil K Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 18/03/2026
1. The present restoration application has been filed against the
order dated 03.02.2026, whereby the review petition was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 05.01.2026.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant contends that, due to reasons beyond his control, the order dated 05.01.2026 could not be complied with. However, he submits that he will now comply with the said order within a period of two weeks.
3. Heard.
4. This Court deems it appropriate to restore the review petition to its original number, subject to the following conditions:
[2026:RJ-JP:11452] (2 of 2) [WRES-108/2026] (a) The applicant shall deposit Rs. 5,000/- with the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jaipur, within a period of four weeks. (b) Requisites shall be filed within a period of two weeks in the original review petition, as directed in the
order dated 05.01.2026. (c) Upon such compliance, the review petition shall stand restored to its original number. (d) In the event of non-compliance, this order shall not come into effect.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the present Writ Restoration Application stands disposed of.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/17