Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46395 (PAT)

Angad Ranjan @ Angad Kumar Ranjan @ Angat Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./91808/2025 · 2026-01-20

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91808 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== 1 . Angad Ranjan @ Angad Kumar Ranjan @ Angat Ranjan S/o Late Chandrika Das Resident of village- Gagan khurd, P.s- Rajauli, District -Nawada 2. Dinesh Das S/o Late Chandrika Das Resident of village- Gagan khurd, P.s- Rajauli, District -Nawada 3 . Ravindra Das S/o Late Chandrika Das Resident of village- Gagan khurd, P.s- Rajauli, District -Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit , APP For informant : Mr. Birendra Kumar , Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State . 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 ( 2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 109, 352, 303 ( 2 ), 76 and 3 (5) of BNS. 3 . According to the FIR, informant alleged that all the accused persons including these petitioners came at the house of informant and started abusing and assaulting informant and his family members. It is further alleged that petitioner No. 1 outraged the modesty of sister-in -law of the informant and other co- accused persons threatened informant Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91808 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026 2/3 and others with dire consequences and also snatched Rs. 50,000/- from mother of informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against them. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature . 5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that there is specific allegation against petitioner No. 1 that he outraged the modesty of sister-in -law of informant. 6. Considering the seriousness and nature of accusation against petitioner No. 1 and gravity of offence , the prayer for pre – arrest bail of petitioner No. 1 is rejected. 7. Considering the general and omnibus allegation against petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 , as named above , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 345 of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91808 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026 3/3 Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T