Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4639 (PAT)

Fekan Ray v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./27144/2026 · 2026-04-28

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27144 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-387 Year-2025 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1. Fekan Ray S/o Kishori Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 2. Fuljhari Devi W/o Kishori Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 3. Fakira Ray S/o Kishori Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 4. Rita Devi W/o Bikaoo Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 5. Bikaoo Ray S/o Kishori Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 6. Kishori Ray S/o Late Varan Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 7. Mintu Devi W/o Fakira Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 8. Rinku Devi W/o Fekan Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. 9. Rani Kumari D/o Bikaoo Ray R/o vill - Ukni, P.S.- Sheohar, Distt.- Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Madhubala Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The accused/petitioners named in FIR and apprehending their arrest in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 387 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 96 of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita. 3. As per FIR, all named co-accused persons Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27144 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/3 abducted the minor daughter of the informant for illicit intercourse with another person. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that during course of investigation, the minor daughter of the informant was recovered and, thereafter, her statement was recorded under Section 183 of BNSS, where she categorically stated that she left her parental house on her own and solemnized her marriage with co-accused Amit Kumar being a major girl, who is not petitioner for the present. It is submitted that petitioners are the immediate family members of the main co-accused Amit Kumar and for said reason only, they were implicated with present crime in question. The petitioners claimed clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail. 6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as the implication of the above- named petitioners prima facie appears being immediate family members of the main co-accused Amit Kumar, with whom the minor daughter of the informant solemnized Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27144 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 3/3 marriage, accordingly, all above named nine petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sheohar/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 387 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. veena/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T