PINKI KUMARI WIFE OF SHRI SUNIL KUMAR NAGAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4161/2026 · 2026-03-06
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4637 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4637 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9660] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4161/2026 Pinki Kumari Wife Of Shri Sunil Kumar Nagar, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 9, Prem Nagar, Village And Post Dhodhasar, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The District Collector, Jaipur.
3. Deputy Director, Mahila And Bal Vikas Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Service, Govindgrah-I, Jaipur.
5. Standing Committee Administration And Establishment, Through Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
6. Gram Panchayat Dhodhsar, Through Its Sarpanch, Panchayat Samiti, Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
7. Smt. Poonam Devi Sharma Wife Of Shri Chetan Sharma, Village And Post Dodsar, Panchayat Samiti, Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kalwania, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 06/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, sought liberty to withdraw this writ petition to make a representation before the respondent-Department.
[2026:RJ-JP:9660] (2 of 2) [CW-4161/2026]
2. Permission sought for is granted.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
4. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent(s) strictly in accordance with law within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of filing of representation.
5. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed by this Court on merits of this Case.
6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /53