Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46366 (CAL)

SK JULFIKER ALI @ BHUTTO v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3146/2026 · 2026-10-06

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

06.10.2026 13 Ct. No. 37 S.D. Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3146 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bhatar Police Station Case No. 381 of 2026 dated 20.07.2026 under Sections 115(2)/308(5)/329(4)/324(4)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Burdwan, Purba Bardhaman. And In Re : Sk. Julfiker Ali @ Bhutto ...… petitioner Mr. U.S. Chattopadhyay Ms. Rajashree Tah …for the petitioner Mr. Sayak Chakraborti Mr. T. Das Ms. Sarmistha Das …for the State Petitioner belongs to a particular political party. Issue of false implication of the petitioner exists. Materials in the case diary do not suggest requirement of custodial interrogation of the petitioner. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. The petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once a week till the conclusion of the investigation. The petitioner shall appear on every date before the Jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused 2 and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) SUROJIT DAS Digitally signed by SUROJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.06 18:17:50 +05'30'