Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46333 (CAL)

SEKH ANIKUL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3112/2026 · 2026-10-06

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

06.10.2026 DL-3 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Rejected) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 3112 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with G.R. Case No.434 of 2024 arising out of Dubrajpur Police Station Case No.234 of 2024 dated 21.08.2024 under Sections 118(2)/109/75/3(5)/126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 adding Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Dubrajpur, Birbhum. And In the matter of: Sekh Anikul ….petitioner Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Advocate Mr. Dhiman Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Quazi Ezaz Ahmed, Advocate …for the petitioner Mr. Gourango Kumar Das, Advocate Mr. Amal Kumar Datta, Advocate Mr. Shayan Sahin Basu, Advocate … for the State Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate Mr. Subhodip Maity, Advocate … for the de facto complainant 1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record. 2. Petitioner stands declared as a proclaimed offender. 3. Court is informed that the trial is in progress with evidence of the prosecution being recorded. 4. In such circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected. 5. C.R.M. (A) 3112 of 2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.07 10:21:02 +05'30'