IMRAN HOSSEN @ IMRAN HOSSAIN @ IMRAN MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/3209/2026 · 2026-10-06
Debangsu Basak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46331 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46331 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
06.10.2026 Item No.53 Court No.37 CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side
C.R.M.(A) 3209 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Baduria Police Station Case No. 209 of 2026 dated 30.04.2026 under Sections 329(3)/118(2)/109/352(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Naya Sanhita, 2023, pending before the Learned Sessions Judge, North 24 Parganas.
And
In the matter of : Imran Hossen @ Imran Hossain
@ Imran Mondal ...… petitioner
Mr. Pronojit Roy, Advocate Mr. Jamal Uddin, Advocate .…for the petitioner
Mr. Sagar Saha, Advocate Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay, Advocate .…for the State
1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be kept with the record.
2. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.
3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
4. Police filed charge-sheet.
5. In an incident of assault, one person suffered injuries. The injury suffered by the victim is classified as blunt trauma.
6. Considering the nature of the incident and the involvement of the petitioner therein and considering the fact that, two coaccused were granted anticipatory bail by
2 the jurisdictional Court, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner will be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
8. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
9. CRM(A) 3209 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.07 10:33:48 +05'30'
3