JAGDISH PRASAD RATHOR SON OF SHRI BADRI LAL RATHOR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4569/2026 · 2026-03-13
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4633 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4633 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10692] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4569/2026
1. Jagdish Prasad Rathor Son Of Shri Badri Lal Rathor, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Patheda, District Baran- 325205 (Raj.)
2. Virendra Kumar Sen Son Of Shri Ramesh Chand Sen, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Mathni, Post Mathna, Tehsil And District Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 302005.
2. Director (Non Gazetted) Medical And Health Services, Sawasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
302005.
3. Additional Director (Gezetted) Medical And Health Services, Sawasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)-302005.
4. Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Kota Zone, Kota.
5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Baran (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 13/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that only on account of the fact that the experience certificate possessed by the petitioners are not being considered in accordance with judgments earlier delivered by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court
[2026:RJ-JP:10692] (2 of 2) [CW-4569/2026] duly confirmed by the Division Bench, the petitioners could not be appointed on the post of Lab Assistant. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case, they are granted liberty to submit a representation before the respondents for redressal of their grievances.
2. In the light of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation highlighting their grievances along with all the documents/judgments, if any, and speaking order shall be passed by the respondent No.2 within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/30