IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90860 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1. Ghutar Yadav @ Ghuteshwar Yadav S/O Late Navy Yadav R/O Village- Dhadhi, P.S- Bedaur, Distt.- Khagaria. 2. Rakesh Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Yadav S/O Ghutar Yadav @ Ghuteshwar Yadav R/O Village- Dhadhi, P.S- Bedaur, Distt.- Khagaria. 3. Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu Kumar S/O Ghutar Yadav @ Ghuteshwar Yadav R/O Village- Dhadhi, P.S- Bedaur, Distt.- Khagaria. 4. Maheshwar Yadav S/O Late Navy Yadav R/O Village- Dhadhi, P.S- Bedaur, Distt.- Khagaria. 5. Rabish Yadav @ Rabish Kumar S/O Ghutar Yadav @ Ghuteshwar Yadav R/O Village- Dhadhi, P.S- Bedaur, Distt.- Khagaria. 6. Rupesh Yadav @ Ruko Kumar S/O Ghutar Yadav @ Ghuteshwar Yadav R/O Village- Dhadhi, P.S- Bedaur, Distt.- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 18-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing vehemently for sometime, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.2, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90860 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 namely, Rakesh Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Yadav and petitioner no. 4, namely, Maheshwar Yadav. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. It is next submitted that petitioner no.1, 3 and 5 are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.6 has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 09.04.2025 the buffalo of Rakesh grazed the maize field of Amrendra, on account of which, firing took place from both sides and in the firing, villager Puran Yadav was injured. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to grazing of maize crop of Amrendra by buffalo of Rakesh, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place in which both sides fired at each other causing injury to Puran, a villager. It is reiterated and submission that petitioner no.1, 3 and 5 are persons with clean antecedent, while petitioner no.6 has antecedent of one case but then no specific allegation is alleged against them. It is also submitted that allegation of firing is not specific. 7. Learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90860 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/3 bail application of the petitioners. 8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and also taking into consideration the fact that petitioner no.1, 3 and 5 are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.6 has antecedent of only one case, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No.106 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T