Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2026 DAILYLAW 463 (MEG)

NURUL AMIN KHANDOKAR v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 8 ORS.

WP(C)/46/2026 · 2026-07-14

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No.10 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 46 of 2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Shri Nurul Amin Khandokar son of (L) Nazrul Islam Khandokar, resident of Tosilderpara P.O & PS Mahendraganj, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya Personnel & Admv. Reforms (B) Department, Meghalaya, Shillong. 3. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya Health & Family Welfare Department, Meghalaya, Shillong 4. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya Finance (Pension Cell) Department, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong. 5. The Director of Health Services (MI), Meghalaya, Shillong. 6. The District Medical & Health Officer, West Garo Hills, Tura. 7. The District Medical and Health Officer, South West Garo Hills, Ampati. 2026:MLHC:710 2 8. The Treasury Officer, Ampati District Treasury, South West Garo Hills, Meghalaya. 9. The Principal Accountant General (A&E) Meghalaya, Shillong. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.A.Sheikh, Adv. Mr. M.R.Marak, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. S.Bhattacharjee, GA for R1-8. Ms. E.B.Passah, Adv. for R 9. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. S.A.Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 2, the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Personnel & Admv. Reforms (B) Department, the matter can be closed. 2026:MLHC:710 3 2. Ms. S.Bhattacharjee, learned GA for the State respondents has also submitted that the Cabinet in its meeting held on 30-06-2026, was pleased to approve the proposal of regularisation, and the same has also been reflected in the affidavit. 3. Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, and the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 2, nothing remains for consideration and the writ petition is closed and disposed of. 4. It is expected that the entire exercise should be completed preferably within a period of four months. Judge 2026:MLHC:710 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.07.14 18:19:55 IST