- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3961 RSA No. 124 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 124 OF 2025 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ULLURAMMA D/O LATE SRI GALIHANUMAIAH, W/O SRI. SUGGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A ANEPALYA VILLAGE, K. GOLLAHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 060. 2. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA @ SAKAMMA D/O. LATE SRI. GALIHANUMAIAH, W/O. SRI. NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/A ANEPALYA VILLAGE, K. GOLLAHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 060. 3. SRI. LAKSHMI NARAYANA S/O. LATE SRI. GALIHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A ANEPALYA VILLAGE, K. GOLLAHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 060. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI S HEMANTH BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3961 RSA No. 124 of 2025 AND: SRI KENGAIAH S/O LATE DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT ANEPALYA VILLAGE, K. GOLLAHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 060. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.10.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.76/2016 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.08.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.640/2011 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3961 RSA No. 124 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23