2026:JHHC:7871 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1335 of 2026 ----- Pintu Das, son of late Kedar Das, resident of village Rupabad, PS Madhupur, PO Pathrol, District Deoghar, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Ms. Lily Sahay, APP …...... 02 /20.03.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the IT Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 4. The prayer of bail of the petitioner was earlier dismissed as withdrawn in BA No. 11205 of 2025 dated 13.01.2026. By filing this case this petitioner renews his prayer for bail. 5. Since the mobile phone recovered from the possession of this petitioner was used for committing cyber-crime which is apparent from the impugned order as links of the mobile number were found in the NCCRP portal/CFCFRMS with acknowledgement number against the mobile number of mobiles recovered from the petitioner showing online financial fraud, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:7871 2 6. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Deoghar Cyber PS Case No. 132 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Cyber Crime Cases Special Court, Deoghar stands rejected. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. 8. The petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for grant of bail, after framing of the charge. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 20.03.2026 Tanuj/CP-3 Uploaded on 23.03.2026