Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4627 (CAL)

GOPINATH GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/253/2026 · 2026-02-09

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

09/02/2026 D/L – 42 Court No.28 S. Kundu Rejected C.R.M.(A) 253 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Nakashipara P.S case no. 204 of 2024 dated 5/3/2024 under sections 341/325/326/307/34 of the IPC. In the matter of: Gopinath Ghosh ...Petitioner. Mr. Snehansu Majumder …for the petitioner. Mr. Saibal Bapuli Mr. A. Bhattacharyya …for the State. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and a co- accused has been granted bail after arrest. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He relies on the statements of witnesses and injury reports. One of the injury reports shows cut injuries on the back of the head requiring seven stitches for repair, the other one shows a cut injury on the face requiring 22 stitches for repair. 3. Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the role ascribed to the present petitioner, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)