Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46221 (CAL)

AMIT DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(H)/82/2026 · 2026-10-05

Aryak Dutt, Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 07. In the High Court at Calcutta 5.10.2026 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction S.D. Appellate Side Ct. No. 37 Bench ID 266447 WPA (H) 82 of 2026 Amit Das Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Chandrachur Chatterjee Ms. Rubab Fatma ….For the petitioner Mr. Dibasish Basu, Ld. AGP.,., Ms. Sneha Dutta Ms. Megha Dutta …For the State Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Ms. Pritha Biswas Ms. Upasana Sarkar …For the respondent no. 9 Writ petitioner seeks whereabouts of his wife and child. A police case was registered on the complaint of the writ petitioner. In such police case, the wife of the writ petitioner recorded a statement under Section 183 of BNSS, where she implicates the writ petitioner of assaulting her and torturing her. She stated that she left the house voluntarily because of the 2 assault and torture meted upon her by the writ petitioner. Report submitted on behalf of the State filed in Court discloses the statement recorded by the wife of the writ petitioner under Section 183 of BNSS. Since the writ petitioner is now aware of the location of his wife and child, no further order need be passed in the writ petition. State no doubt will take into cognizance the statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS by the wife of the writ petitioner and take appropriate measures with regard thereto. WPA (H) 82 of 2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Aryak Dutt, J.) SUROJIT DAS Digitally signed by SUROJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.05 17:53:20 +05'30'