Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4622 (JHR)

RAJ ALIAS MD CHAND v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1812/2026 · 2026-02-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:5935] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.1812 of 2026 ------ Raj @ Md. Chand aged about 21 years son of Aula Miyan @ Md. Kayum Resident of Village- Simariya, Dhaura, P.O.- S.P. Colliery, P.S.- Giridih (M), District- Giridih .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27-02-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.376 of 2024 (S.T. No.465 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Section 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 118, 109, 103 (1) of the B.N.S., 2023. This is the third journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail as earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 08.08.2025 passed in B.A. No.6715 of 2025 and the same was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 05.12.2025 passed in B.A. No.11170 of 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile, the informant has been examined and he has failed to identify the petitioner who was present through video conferencing. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.12.2025 passed in B.A. No.10939 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.05.2025 as has been mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Giridih in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.376 of 2024 (S.T. No.465 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 27.02.2026-Animesh/