IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4820 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Son of Dharmu Ray @ Dharmuraj Resident of Village -Madhepur, PS - Madhepur, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramchandra Jha Raman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Madhubani Cyber P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 297, 111(2),(b), 114(4), 3(5) of the BNS and 66(C), 66(D) of IT Act. 3. According to the allegation, the petitioner illegally played and facilitated online betting games and lured innocent people with promises of earning more money. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. He was not arrested at the spot. Nothing was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4820 of 2026(3) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 recovered from his possession. His name has figured in confessional statement of co-accused Sunny Kumar, who was arrested by the police. The petitioner is under custody since 31.10.2025. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner is a part of an organized gang, indulged in illegal game of satta. The petitioner's shop was searched and he was found talking with Gopal Kumar with gambling-related websites and on his mobile phone, the website of gambling was open. 6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner doesn’t deserve the privileges for bail. Accordingly, it is rejected. 7. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail after six months from today. kundan/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T