Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
05.10.2026 Serial nos. 73-74 [Srimanta] Ct. No. - 39
CRR/323/2023
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
-And-
In the matter of : Dr. Sukanta Majumdar
… … Petitioner. With
CRR/265/2023
In re : An Application under Sections 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
-And-
In the matter of : T. V. Today Network Limited & Anr. … … Petitioners. Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Priyankar Ganguly, Ms. Shalini Bairagi
…For the petitioner in CRR/323/2023. Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. P.P., Mr. Anamitra Banerjee, Mr. Sreyash Kumar Singh …For the State. 1. Notice upon the de facto complainant filed in Court today be kept with the record. 2. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the de facto complainant. 3. The affidavit of undertaking filed by the petitioner is taken on record. A copy of the same has been served to the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as Investigating Officer. 2
4. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that two other co-accused persons had filed another criminal revisional application being CRR/265/2023 and the same was disposed of by the Coordinate Bench vide order dated 12.09.2023 on the basis of declaration made in the affidavit by the said two accused persons. The present petitioner prays for similar relief as he also filed an undertaking before the Investigating Officer as well as learned Public Prosecutor, High Court, Calcutta. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State raised no-objection and submits that if the case is disposed of the State has no objection to that effect. 6. Having heard the submission of the learned Counsel for the parties and on perusal of the undertaking, this Court finds the State has no-objection with regard to the undertaking given by the petitioner. The contention advanced by the State is accepted. Accordingly, further proceeding of the case being G.R. Case No. 588 of 2023 against the present petitioner is unwarranted and same is hereby quashed. 7. CRR/323/2023 is allowed and disposed of. Connected applications, if any, are also, thus, disposed. 8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Trial Court for information.
10.All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of the Calcutta High Court. 3 11.Urgent xerox certified copy, if applied for by the parties, same shall be supplied upon compliance of the necessary formalities. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)