DHEERAJ KUMAR YADAV @ SUMIT KUMAR @ DHIRAJ KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1317/2026 · 2026-03-23
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4621 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4621 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8125
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No.1317 of 2026
Dheeraj Kumar Yadav @ Sumit Kumar @ Dhiraj Kumar Yadav, aged about 20 year, son of Sadanand Yadav, residents of Village Sobhanpur Bhatta, P.O. & P.S.-Sahibganj (M), District- Sahebganj.
…. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, APP ------
2/23.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahibganj Town P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026, registered under Section 87 and 96 of the B.N.S., pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Sahibganj.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the girl has gone on her own will. He also submits that the compromise has also taken place on 5/2/2026, contained in annexure-2. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the girl is minor aged about 16 years only.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that although the compromise took place, however, again the petitioner has committed same wrong and for that, another case has been lodged being Nagar P.S. Case No.48 of 2026 on 21st March 2026. He submits, in that view of the matter, anticipatory bail may kindly be
2026:JHHC:8125
2
rejected.
6. Considering that the girl is aged about 16 years only, in spite of the compromise, the same wrong has been further done by the petitioner and for that another case being Nagar P.S. Case No.48 of 2026 has been lodged, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 23.03.2026 R.Kumar