Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4621 (AP)

Vakkalagadda Geeta Rai @ Tulabandula Lakshmi Gayatri, v. Vakkalagadda Satyanarayana (plaintiff),

CRP/1500/2026 · 2026-07-05

Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement : 06-07-2026 Date of uploading : 09-07-2026 APHC010196392026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1500/2026 Between: 1. VAKKALAGADDA GEETA RAI @ TULABANDULA LAKSHMI GAYATRI,, W/O. CHANDRA SEKAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D. NO. 1-1-2/D/B, 1ST FLOOR, JAWAHAR NAGAR, NEAR RTC CLOSS ROAD, TEMPORARILY COME DOWN TO VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. VAKKALAGADDA SATYANARAYANA PLAINTIFF, S/O. VENKATA RADHA KRISHNA MURTY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. D. NO. 5/443, REBALA VARI STREET, BESIDES PTG APARTMENTS, STONE HOOUSEPET NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. VAKKALAGADDA VENKATA RADHA KRISHNA MURTY DIED, S/O. SATYANARAYA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 11-45-49, MATHAM VEEDHI (THUVVA VARI VEEDHI), VIJAYAWADA-1. 3. VAKKALAGADDA VEBUGOPAL, S/O. VENKATA RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 10-17-2, UPSTAIRS, GUTURUVARI LANE BHRAMHANA VEEDHI, VIJAYAWADA-1. 4. DEVATI BHASKARA RAO, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 17-3-4, MANNEN VARI STREET, ISLAM PET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT KARUMURI LAKSHMI KANAKA DURGA DEVI DIVYA, D/O. BHASKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. D. NO, 17-3-4, MANNEN VARI STREET, ISLAMPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. KARUMURI LAKSHMI KANAKA DURGA DEVI DIVYA, D/O. BHASKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 17-3-4, MANNEN VARI STREET, ISLAMPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. YENUGUKONDA TEJASAI, W/O. MAHESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 17-3-4, MANNEM VARI STREET, ISLAMPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1500 OF 2026 ORDER: Sri M.Noor, learned counsel representing Sri S.Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the interlocutory order dismissing the application for amendment of the written statement was challenged in the present civil revision petition. He further submits that since the suit has been decreed, the civil revision petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the same, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J Date: 06.07.2026. Pab Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1500 OF 2026 DATE: 06.07.2026 Pab