Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 462 (UTT)

ROHTASH KUMAR v. BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED BEHL

WPSS/197/2026 · 2026-02-02

Siddhartha Sah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSS No.197 of 2026 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the Caveator. 3. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at Bar that the impugned order has been revoked. Therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. [ (Siddhartha Sah, J.) Vacation Judge 02.02.2026 Ravi