Sl. No.06. 30.09.2026 Suman Ct. 237 CRR 972 of 2026 Ajay Jaiswal Vs. The State of West Bengal and Anr. Mr. Pritam Majumdar Mr. Subhajit Purkait ..for the petitioner Mr. Subir Ganguly Ms. Supriti Sarkhel ..for the State It appears that a proceeding was initiated against the petitioner under Section 129 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pursuant to Bizpore Police Station General Diary Entry Nos. 535 and 538 dated February 11, 2026, on the basis of a police report submitted before the learned Special Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore Police Commissionerate. Referring to the various orders passed by the learned Magistrate, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being insisted upon to execute the bond by the learned Magistrate without conducting an inquiry under Section 135 of the said Sanhita. Learned advocate appearing for the State disputes the aforesaid allegation. It appears that the petitioner appeared before the learned Magistrate on July 15, 2026. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, no further order is called for in the present revisional application at this stage. Needless to observe that the learned Magistrate shall not insist upon the petitioner executing the bond without completion of the inquiry contemplated under Section 135 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Accordingly, CRR 972 of 2026 is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.) 2