Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46191 (MAD)

Sakthivel v. State Represented by Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/15805/2026 · 2026-07-03

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL O.P.No.15805 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.15805 of 2026 and CRL.M.P.Nos.10342 & 10378 of 2026 1. Sakthivel, S/o.Ramasamy, NO.61, Valliammi Nagar, 2nd Street, Villivakkam, Chennai - 600 049 2. Harikrishnan, S/o.Murugesan, No.23-A, VAlliyammal Nagar, 1st STreet, Villivakkam, Chennai - 600 049 ..Petitioners Vs 1. State Represented by Inspector of Police, Villivakkam Police Station, Kolathur, Chennai. Crime No.252 of 2024 2. Srinivasan, S/o.Manikandan, NO.54, Valliammal Nagar, 3rd Street, Villivakkam, Chennai - 600 049. ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to call for the records relating to the impugned Final Report in C.C.NO.4078 of 2025 on the file of the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai and to quash the same and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL O.P.No.15805 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioners: Mr.M.Sivakumar For Respondents: Mr.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Criminal side) For R1 *** O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the final report and all further proceedings in C.C.No.4078 of 2025 on the file of the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai on compromise. It can be seen that the same is taken on file for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 279, 338 and 506 (2) of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The parties have filed Joint Compromise Memo. The de facto complainant and the victim are also present before this Court and the supporting affidavits are also filed. 3. Upon examination by this Court, they also stood by the affidavit and submitted that the case can be quashed on compromise. 4. I have gone through the gravamen of the allegations contained in the case. It can be seen that when the de facto complainant and the accused/petitioners were said to have been hitting against each other and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL O.P.No.15805 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 quarrel ensued. The de facto complainant and the victim, both of them are present before this Court. 5. Considering the fact that the parties have resolved their issue, I am of the view that the facts of this case are within the four corners of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab1 , and therefore, the case is liable to be quashed on compromise. 6. In view thereof, the Criminal Original Petition in Crl.O.P.No.15805 of 2026 stands allowed. The final report and all further proceedings in C.C.No.4078 of 2025 on the file of XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore shall stand quashed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 03-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No sts 1Reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL O.P.No.15805 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. sts To: 1) XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore. 2) The Inspector of Police, Villivakkam Police Station, Kolathur, Chennai. Crime No.252 of 2024 3) The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Order made in CRL.O.P.No.15805 of 2026 Dated: 03-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis