30.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.592. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (A) 3091 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Manikchak Police Station case no. 229 of 2026 dated 21.04.2026 under Sections and under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/118(1)/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Sk. Liton & Ors. ……Petitioners. Mr. Kalidas Saha Ms. Khushi Mollick Mr. P. Kumar Chauhan .....for the Petitioners. Mr. Indradip Das Mr. Sayan Mukherjee ……for the State. Mr. Soumya Nag Mr. Mayukh Majumder .......for the De-facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant submits that the case is of double murder cases. Learned advocate appearing for the State has pointed out to the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS which reflects the name of the accused persons who are being approached this Court with prayer for anticipatory bail. Having considered the complicity of the present petitioners, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. 2 Accordingly, CRM (M) 3091 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)