Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4618 (PNJ)

LAL SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

LPA/976/2026 · 2026-04-09

Deepak Manchanda, Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

LPA-976-2026 (O&M)  127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-976-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.04.2026 Lal Singh ...Appellant Vs. State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J.(Oral) CM-2416-LPA-2026 Present application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 10 days in re-filing the appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed. Delay of 10 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. Main case 1. Learned counsel for the appellant argues that certain arguments were raised before the learned Single Judge which were not considered while passing the order dated 16.01.2026, hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed, at this stage with liberty to file a review of the same before the learned Single Judge. 2. Ordered accordingly. VANITA 2026.04.18 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order and judgment LPA-976-2026 (O&M)  3. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 09.04.2026 vanita Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VANITA 2026.04.18 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order and judgment