Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4617 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA GOYAL S/O LATE SHRI RADHEYSHYAM GOYAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/4866/2023 · 2026-03-13

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10726] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4866/2023 1. Rajendra Goyal S/o Late Shri Radheyshyam Goyal, R/o Purani Anaj Mandi, Gangapur City Partner Of Firm Shri Baba Narayan Das And Company, Purani Anaj Mandi, Gangapur City. 2. Firm Shri Govind Oil Mills Naya Bazar, Gangapur City Through Manager/owner Rajendra Goyal S/o Late Shri Radheyshyam Goyal R/o Purani Anaj Mandi, Gangapur City . ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Smt. Shakuntala Devi W/o Sitaram Gupta, R/o Purani Anaj Mandi, Gangapur City P.s. Gangapur City, Distt. Sawai Madhopur(Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Rakh Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, AGA Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Atul Kumar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 13/03/2026 Learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant does not wish to execute the order dated 08.03.2022. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if the need arises. Permission sought for is granted. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. [2026:RJ-JP:10726] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4866/2023] Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. Considering the age of the litigation, learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /258