Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46161 (KAR)

SMT. KAVITHA v. THE COMMISSIONER BBMP

WP/13939/2018 · 2026-01-27

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4390 WP No. 13939 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.13939 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SMT. KAVITHA W/O LATE SHIVANNA R AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.43/1, (PID NO.63-95-43), 1ST MAIN ROAD, SUDDAGUNTE PALYA BANGALORE-560 029. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BBMP BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BBMP HEAD OFFICE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE – 560 002. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BTM LAYOUT SUB-DIVISION, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, 16TH MAIN ROAD, BTM 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE – 560 029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 12.7.2017 PASSED BY THE Digitally signed by PAVITHRA B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4390 WP No. 13939 of 2018 KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL NO.1168/2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECTION DEEMED FIT TO BE PASSED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY EITHER ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND RESULTANTLY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED CONFIRMATION ORDER DTD 023.10.2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-B PASSED UNDER SEC.321[3] OF KMC ACT 1976 BY THE R-2 AUTHORITY VIDE ANNEXURE-B TO THE PETITION OR REMANDING THE MATTER TO THE TRIBUNAL FOR FRESH CONSIDERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 07.01.2026, none appears for the petitioner today also. 2. Perusal of the order sheet indicates that none has been appearing for the petitioner on earlier occasions. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1