Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010002412026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./91/2026 DILBAHAR HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O LATE RAHMAT ALI LASKAR, R/ONIZ RUPAIBALI, P.S LAKHIPUR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. 2:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX D/O LATE HASHIM ALI LASKAR R /O NIZ RUPAIBALI P.S. LAKHIPUR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J LASKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, A NEOG, AMICUS CURIAE R2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 23 .04. 2026 Heard Mr. J. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent No.1. Also heard Ms. A. Neog, learned Amicus Curiae representing the respondent No. 2. Page No.# 2/3 2. This bail application has been preferred by the petitioner namely, DILBAHAR HUSSAIN LASKAR under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking bail in connection with Special (POCSO) Case No. 122/2025 (arising out of Lakhipur P.S. Case No. 128/2025) registered under Sections 65(1)/ 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 3. The allegation as contained in the F.I.R. dated 05.10.2025 against the petitioner is that the petitioner has forcibly taken a minor victim girl inside his shop and committed rape on her as a result of which she became pregnant and subsequently she gave birth to a male child on 26.09.2025. 4. The case dairy is received and perused. It appears that during the course of investigation, the I.O. had collected blood sample of the victim girl and the male child as well as the accused/ petitioner for forensic science laboratory (FSL) examination and the certified copy of the report of the forensic science laboratory examination is placed before this Court and the same indicates that the DNA sample of the alleged victim girl matched with the child but did not match with the accused/ petitioner. 5. Having regard to the same and without any observation on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner may be released on bail at this stage. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner above named shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only with 2 (two) sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 6. This bail is granted under the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall not try to influence any person acquainted with Page No.# 3/3 the facts of the case, in any manner; (ii) that the petitioner shall continue to cooperate with the trial of the case as and when commences. 7. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. 8. Send back the case dairy. 9. The copy of the report of FSL, dated 06.01.2026 be kept as a part of record of this case. JUDGE Comparing Assistant