Suraj v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thoothukudi South
CRL OP(MD)/7298/2026 · 2026-06-25
P Dhanabal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46142 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46142 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7298 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2026 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7298 of 2026 Suraj ...Petitioner Vs. 1.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.222 of 2026) 2.Somasundara Nagarajan ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483(2) of BNS, to cancel the bail granted to the 2nd respondent in Crl.M.P.No.1795 of 2026 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District, dated 01.04.2026 in Crime No.222 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.KA.Raamakrishnan For Respondents :Mr.P.Vetrivel for R1 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Mr.S.Surya for R2 O RDER
This petition has been filed to cancel the bail granted to the 2nd respondent in Crl.M.P.No.1795 of 2026 on the file of the learned Principal 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7298 of 2026 District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District, dated 01.04.2026 in Crime No.222 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. 2.Heard Both sides. 3.The main ground raised by the petitioner is that the investigation has not been completed and the second respondent was arrested only on 24.03.2026 and was released on bail on crucial stage of investigation and there is a chance for tampering the evidences and the offences are grave in nature. 4.The above said aspects has been considered by the Sessions Court and thereafter, only the bail was granted. The Sessions Court recorded the reasons that the petitioner is in judicial custody for 14 days and the investigation has been completed and co-accused was granted bail and thereby there is no ground to cancel the bail granted to the second petitioner by the trial Court. This petition has no merits and deserves to be dismissed. 5.Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. Speaking : Yes / No 25.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No TM 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7298 of 2026 To 1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi. 2.The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.222 of 2026) 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7298 of 2026 P. DHANABAL. J. TM Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7298 of 2026 25.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis