Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46116 (MAD)

Nanthakumar v. The State of Tamilnadu

CRL OP(MD)/12597/2026 · 2026-06-29

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.12597 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No.12597 of 2026 Nanthakumar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. Cr.No.201/2026. ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Cr.No.201/2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Bharathiveerakumar J, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.Murugesan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.12597 of 2026 Sections 296(b), 118(1) & 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023, in Crime No.201 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 06.05.2026 at about 01.15 hours, the petitioner developed quarrel with the defacto complainant and attacked him with a loudspeaker/Sound boz and caused grievous injuries. Hence, case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital and though the petitioner has 15 previous cases, out of which, 3 cases were already disposed of. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, submitted that the petitioner attacked the defacto 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.12597 of 2026 complainant and caused injuries and the investigation is at preliminary stage and the petitioner is a habitual offender and he has 15 previous cases. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have gone through the FIR and also the connected materials. 6. The list of previous cases shows that the petitioner is a habitual offender and he is having various offences including a case of murder. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, at this stage. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 29.06.2026 dss 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.12597 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR,J DSS To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Musiri, Thiruchirapalli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12597 of 2026 Date : 29/06/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis