DEEPAK KOCHYA S/O SHRI RAM KARAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2079/2026 · 2026-04-17
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4611 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4611 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16273] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2079/2026 Deepak Kochya S/o Shri Ram Karan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gurjaro Ki Sirohi Akoda Marg, Narena, Police Station Narena, District Dholpur, Presently Resided At 52, Ram Singh Colony, Sector 35, Pratap Nagar, Police Station Malpura Gate, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ---Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 17/04/2026
1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused- applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 309/2025 registered at Police Station Bagru District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023 and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 305(a), 331(3) of BNS, 2023 dismissed the bail application before it.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. It is submitted that the applicant is in judicial custody as the police has completed the investigation and has submitted challan in the Court, hence, the continued detention of the applicant in now not warranted for any
[2026:RJ-JP:16273] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2079/2026] purpose as now nothing is to be recovered or to be investigated from him. It is also submitted that the trial of the case will further take long considerable time, hence, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant second bail application. It is submitted that there are 33 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant.
The criminal antecedents are reproduced hereinbelow: Ø-la- eq-la- o /kkjk Fkkuk urhtk 1 845@17] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 2 42@17] /kkjk 380 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 3 44@17] /kkjk 380 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 4 71@17] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 5 73@17] /kkjk 380 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 6 115@17] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 7 201@17] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 8 211@17] /kkjk 380 Hkk-n-la- dj/kuh] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 9 93@14] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 10 118@14] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 11 167@14] /kkjk 392 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 12 248@20] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 13 273@20] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 14 307@20] /kkjk 401] 34 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 15 56@20] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 16 76@20] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 17 100@20] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekuljksoj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 18 61@17] /kkjk 457] 380 Hkk-n-la- Lkakxkusj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 19 84@22] /kkjk 394 Hkk-n-la- Lkkaxkusj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 20 157@22] /kkjk 395 Hkk-n-la- eqgkuk] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 21 158@22] /kkjk 380] 427 Hkk-n-la- eqgkuk] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 22 153@22] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- cx:] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ
[2026:RJ-JP:16273] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2079/2026] 23 59@22] /kkjk 457] 380 Hkk-n-la- jhaxl lhdj isf.Max dksVZ 24 464@18] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- gjekM+k] t;iqj /kkjk 299 n-iz-la- esa okafNr 25 126@19] /kkjk 363] 366 Hkk-n-la- xksfoUnx< isf.Max dksVZ 26 660@22] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- Ekkuljksoj isf.Max dksVZ 27 37@22] /kkjk 380] 457 Hkk-n-la- XkksfoUnx<+ isf.Max dksVZ 28 619@22] /kkjk 382] 120ch Hkk-n-la- eqgkuk isf.Max dksVZ 29 554@13] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- izrkiuxj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 30 218@14] /kkjk 379 Hkk-n-la- izzrkiuxj] t;iqj isf.Max dksVZ 31 47@23] /kkjk 4@25 vkElZ ,DV Ekkyiqjk xsV isf.Max dksVZ 32 176@24] /kkjk 323] 328] 394] 458] 34 Hkk-n-la- vkesj isf.Max dksVZ 33 493@25] /kkjk 331¼4½ 305¼,½ ch,u,l izrkiuxj] t;iqj
4. Heard and considered. 5.
Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the material available on record and taking note of the fact that there are 33 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /s-152