- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3651 WP No. 13881 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 13881 OF 2018 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. MR H N SATHYANARAYANA GUPTA S/O LATE H.N. NARAYANA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO.9, SINGHI SAFFIRE FLAT 105 17TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, OPP BSK SWIMMING POOL BSK 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560070 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H N SATHYANARAYANA GUPTA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-01 REP BY ITS SECRETARY 2. BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE CORPORATION CIRCLE, BANGALORE 560 002, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3651 WP No. 13881 of 2018 3. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 4. BEL HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY JALAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 013 REP BY ITS SECRETARY 5. SRI. HARI OM GOYAL S/O LATE RICKSABDAS GOYAL AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.22, 3RD CROSS, RM LAYOUT, BALEPET, BANGALORE-560053 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI N R JAGADEESWARA, ADV., FOR R2; SRI AJAY KUMAR M, ADV., FOR R3; SRI R K AMARNATH, ADV., FOR R4; SRI S GANGADHARA AITHAL, ADV., FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH PLAN DTD 10.1.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-F ACCORDED BY R-3 FOR PUTTING UP COMMERCIAL COMPLEX IN SITE NO.08, BEL HOUSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, BANGALORE 560 094 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3651 WP No. 13881 of 2018 ORAL ORDER 1. On account of the counsel for the petitioner having expired, Court notice had been issued to the petitioner, which has been served. 2. Since there was no appearance, the matter was adjourned to today to provide one more opportunity for the petitioner to appear. Today also there is no appearance on the part of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE YKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9