BLOOMBERG WAHLANG v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS.
WP(C)/313/2026 · 2026-07-14
H S Thangkhiew
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 461 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 461 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No.05 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 313 of 2026
Date of Decision: 14.07.2026
1. Shri. Bloomberg Wahlang.
S/o. (L) Rev. Gerson Lyngdoh
R/o. Patharkhmah Village
P.S. Nongpoh
Ri Bhoi District,
Meghalaya.
………. Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Meghalaya,
Represented by the Chief Secretary to
the Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. The Deputy Commissioner,
Ri Bhoi District, Nongpoh, Meghalaya.
3. Executive Magistrate
Ri Bhoi District, Nongpoh
Meghalaya.
4. The Officer-In-Charge,
Patharkhmah Police Station,
Ri Bhoi District,
Meghalaya.
5. Smti. Wansalan Lyngdoh,
D/o. (L) Bisho Singh
R/o. Patharkhmah Village
Ri Bhoi District,
Meghalaya.
2026:MLHC:714
2
………. Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. K. V. Kharlyngdoh, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. A. D. Syiem, GA for R 1-4.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Heard Mr. K. V. Kharlyngdoh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Ms. A. D. Syiem, learned GA, is present on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
3. No notice be necessary for the respondent No. 5.
4. It appears from the submissions and from the materials placed that the petitioner is seeking a direction that the Executive Magistrate, respondent No. 3, of the Ri Bhoi District, Nongpoh, afford the writ petitioner a fair hearing in Legal Heirship Case No. 2 of 2026, which is pending adjudication.
5. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner, has attempted to make out grounds to warrant interference, in the considered view of this Court the 2026:MLHC:714
3
writ petition is premature as the matter is still seized by the concerned court/authority.
6. In view of this matter, at this stage the petition is not entertained. Needless to add, in any forum it is expected that adequate opportunity be granted to the parties who appear before it to present their case.
7. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of.
JUDGE Meghalaya 14.07.2026
“Tengmit”
2026:MLHC:714 Digitally signed by TENGMIT R MARAK Date: 2026.07.14 18:50:43 IST