2026:HHC:8940 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3684 of 2026 Decided on : 25.03.2026 Ravinder Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Balak Ram Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) In light of the fact that the stay of the petitioner is not complete at GSSS Kiari, District Shimla, H.P, this petition is premature. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the observation that after completion of three years of service at GSSS Kiari, District Shimla, H.P, the petitioner may file an appropriate representation to the competent Authority, in terms 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:8940 of the prayers made in this writ petition and the Authority may take appropriate call thereupon, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 25, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)