- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4470 WP No. 1825 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 1825 OF 2026 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NEELAMMA W/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 2. SRI. VEERAPPADEVARU S. S/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT BYADANAKATTE VILLAGE SATENAHALLI POST, GUBBI TALUK TUMAKURU TALUK AN DISTRICT - 572 117. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH V.B., ADVOCATE) AND: THE SPECIAL LAO, HEMAVATHI CANAL DIVISION MINI VIDAN SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD TUMKUR-572 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.J. HARISH, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT, THE S.L.A.O., HEMAVATHI CANAL DIVISION, Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4470 WP No. 1825 of 2026 MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, TUMAKURU, TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 28.04.1994 VIDE ANNEXURE-B IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner at Annexure-B dated 28.04.1994 in accordance with law. 2. The representation at Annexure-B is made seeking for a reference to the Civil Court for adjudication regarding quantum of compensation as awarded. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the representation at Annexure-B would be considered and appropriate orders passed strictly in accordance with law. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4470 WP No. 1825 of 2026 4. Keeping open all contentions, petition is disposed of directing the respondent to pass appropriate orders as regards the representation at Annexure-B within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to state, if for any reason there is delay beyond the period of 3 months, necessary extension of time is required to be sought before this Court. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16