- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4237 WP No. 2123 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2123 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: GHOUSIA KHANNUM W/O. C.N.AKMAL, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. KHAZINAGAR, NEAR ANGEL SCHOOL, SHIVAMOGGA-577203. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H S SANTHOSH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA- 577201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SHIMOGA SUB-DIVISION, SHIMOGA-577201. 4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, NADAKACHERI, NIDHIGE HOBLI, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA-577 201. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4237 WP No. 2123 of 2026 5. RAJEEV RANJAN SINGH, S/O PUSHKAL SINGH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. NO. 5/102, DEEPAK DELUXE, SAHARA GRACE, JANSKIPURAM, LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH – 226021. 6. AYESHA JHULKA, W/O A K MOHAMMED NAWAZ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 6TH CROSS, NEHRU NAGAR, SAGARA CITY - 577 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA FOR R1 TO R4; NOTICE TO R5 AND R6 NOT ORDERED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS WHICH ULTIMATELY IN THE PASSING OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED PASSED BY THE R4 AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 10.09.2024 PASSED BY THE R4 TAHSILDAR IN MR.NO.T 15/2024-25 AS PER ANNX-L AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents No.1 to 4. Notice to other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons: Learned Additional Government Advocate has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner is questioning a - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4237 WP No. 2123 of 2026 mutation order passed by the respondent-Tahsildar, which is an order appealable before the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 2. Upholding the submission of the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands disposed of while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Assistant Commissioner to redress her grievances. 3. Office is hereby directed to return the certified copies/original documents, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy for the file. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL: CT: JL