Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46073 (MAD)

Mundasamy v. The State of Tamilnadu rep by

CRL OP(MD)/12974/2026 · 2026-07-01

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.OP.(MD)No.12974 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL.OP.(MD)No.12974 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.12708 of 2026 1.Mundasamy 2.Balakrishnan @ Balamurugan 3.Mariappan 4.Tamilselvan @ Tamilarasan 5.Satheesh 6.Manokaran 7.Muthukumar 8.Velmurugan 9.Chinnadurai 10.Sivakumar 11.Kathirvel ... Petitioners Vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam Sub-Division, Thoothukudi District. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Seidunganallur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.103 of 2023) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12974 of 2026 3.Kanthasamy ... Respondents PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, to call for the records in connection with the impugned charge sheet in S.C.No.334 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned I Additional District Court, Thoothukudi District and quash the same insofar as the petitioners are concerned. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Veerapandi For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun, Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) for R1 & R2. Mr.B.Satheeshkumar for R3 ORDER The present criminal original petition has been filed by the accused in S.C.No.334 of 2025 on the file of the learned I Additional District Court, Thoothukudi seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioners charged with the offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 307, 506(2) and 326 of I.P.C. 2.A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the accused persons said to have attacked the defacto complainant with the stone. The 161 statement of the doctor reveals that the complainant left the hospital without information and therefore, the nature of injuries cannot be stated. The defacto complainant had sustained only simple injuries and Section 307 of IPC cannot be invoked. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12974 of 2026 3.Pending trial, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant has agreed for quashing of the charge sheet. Today, the defacto complainant is present and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the charge sheet. 4.Considering the above said facts, the charge sheet in S.C.No.334 of 2025 on the file of the learned I Additional District Court, Thoothukudi stands quashed. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The memorandum of compromise shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01.07.2026 Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No ias To 1.The I Additional District Court, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam Sub-Division, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Seidunganallur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12974 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J . ias CRL.OP.(MD)No.12974 of 2026 01.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis