Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46060 (KAR)

SOMACHARI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/12613/2017 · 2026-01-21

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3271 WP No. 12613 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.12613 OF 2017 (LB-UC) BETWEEN: 1. SOMACHARI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNACHARI N.NO.286, XII CROSS, RAILWAY LAYOUT, II STAGE, VIJAYANAGAR, DEVARAJA MOHALLA, MYSOORU – 570 001. 2. J.HARIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O JAVAREGOWDA, TANDASANAHALLI, KONANAHALLI POST, MANDYA TALUK & DISTRICT – 571 401. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHIT.U.THODKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, MS BUILDING, BENGALORE-560 001. 2. SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE URBAN LAND CEILING ACT, MYSOORU – 570 001. 3. COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3271 WP No. 12613 of 2017 MYSOORU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MYSOORU – 570 001 4. SRI.MAHADESWARA HOUSE BUILDING CO OP SOCIETY #264/A, I MAIN, VV MOHALLA GOKULAM, II STAGE, MYSOORU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. DEVAMMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, D/O LATE DODDAMARIGOWDA, H.NO.28, II CROSS, I MAIN, KUMBARAKOPPLU, DEVARAJA MOHALLA, MYSOORU CITY – 570 001. 6. NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, D/O LATE DODDAMARIGOWDA, W/O NARASEGOWDA, H.NO.117/1, HOSA BEEDHI, KUMBARAKOPPLU, DEVARAJ MOHALLA, MYSOORU CITY – 570 001. 7. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, D/O LATE DODDAMARIGOWDA, W/O MAYAPPA TM HOSUR VILLAGE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 570 001. 8. YASHODAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,D/O LATE DODDAMARIGOWDA, W/O MAHADEVU PAMPINAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DIST – 571 401. . …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.G.BHANUPRAKASH, AAG A/W - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3271 WP No. 12613 of 2017 SMT. CHANDINI SINGH, FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. SHASHANK SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R6 AND R7, R4 AND R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 29.05.1991 PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNX-S AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 14.01.2026, counsel for the petitioners once again seeks for adjournment. 2. Such adjournment cannot be granted in the teeth of the order dated 14.01.2026. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11