- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5529 WP No. 1757 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 1757 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S SHAKTHI PRINTTECH BY ITS PROP. SRI. SARAVANAN V N, S/O SRI V NARAYANMURTHY, AGED 45 YEARS, NO.16, 3RD AND 5TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, BANGALORE-560021 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SANDHYA U. PRABHU., ADV.) AND: CANARA BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER/MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE WEST, CANARA BANK CHITRAPUR MUTT COMPLEX, MALLESWARAM, 15TH CROSS, BANGALORE-560055 …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5529 WP No. 1757 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE NO. REF.RESPONDENT BANK DATED 09/12/2025 BEARING ARMII/SN/01/2025-26 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTIESAND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, EQUITY AND LAW, GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK DATED 09/12/2025 BEARING NO. REF. ARMII/SN/01/2025-26 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ITS FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: *** - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5529 WP No. 1757 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the sale notice dated 09.12.2025. The petitioner has an equal efficacious remedy. The petitioner without exhausting efficacious remedy, has filed this writ petition. 2. In view of proposition of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of RIKHAB CHAND JAIN VS. UNION OF INDIA IN C.A.NO.6719 OF 2012 disposed off on 12.11.2025, the writ petition is not maintainable. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. 4. A liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the sale notice before the appropriate forum. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB