Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46028 (MAD)

Thirumal v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

CRL OP(MD)/12510/2026 · 2026-07-01

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 and CRL.MP.(MD)No.12325 of 2026 1.Thirumal 2.Nagaraj ... Petitioners Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Tahildhar, Kayadhar Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by the Inspector of Police, Kadambur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings in Miscellaneous Case No.24 of 2026 dated 15.06.2026 issued by the second respondent and quash the same. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 For Petitioners : Mr.R.J.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh, Government Advocate(Crl.side) ORDER Present criminal original petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings of the second respondent dated 15.06.2026 wherein the petitioners have been called upon to appear for hearing based upon the order of this Court in WP.CRL.(MD)No.3035 of 2026 dated 09.06.2026. 2.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court had only directed the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, to conduct the enquiry. However, the second respondent, namely, the Tahsildar, does not have any jurisdiction whatsoever to conduct the enquiry. That apart, the enquiry initiated on 10.06.2026 has already been completed and, therefore, a second enquiry cannot be initiated by the Tahsildar. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 3.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondents submitted that there is a dispute between the two groups in conducting the temple festival. The keys of the temple has been are retained by the second petitioner. In such circumstances, there is a request from the general public of the locality to open the temple for daily poojas and therefore, meeting has been conducted. 4.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the available records. 5.As far as the compliance of the order in WP.CRL.(MD)No.3035 of 2026, dated 09.06.2026 is concerned, only the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti has been directed to conduct the peace committee meeting and in such circumstances, the present summons issued by the second respondent is not sustainable in the eye of the law and therefore, the same is quashed. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 6.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti is directed to conduct the enquiry and find a solution, not only for conducting daily poojas, but also for conducting kodai festival for the year 2027. 7.With the above direction, this criminal original petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. NCC : Yes/No 01.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No gns 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Tahildhar, Kayadhar Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Kadambur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J . gns CRL.OP.(MD)No.12510 of 2026 01.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis