Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46028 (CAL)

SK RASIDUL ISLAM @ JWELL AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3119/2026 · 2026-09-30

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 D/L 613 30.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (A) 3119 of 2026 Sk Rasidul Islam @ Jwell & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Saktigarh Police Station Case No. 170 of 2026 dated 23.05.2026 under Sections 448/384/427/506/34 of the IPC, 1860 And In the matter of : 1. Sk Rasidul Islam @ Jwell 2. Raju Sk 3. Azad Rahaman Seikh 4. Sekh Kabir @ Sk Kabir @ Lalan 5. Sekh Momin @ Momin Sk 6. Ganesh Dutta 7. Babar Sekh @ Babar Sk 8. Habibul Mallick ……Petitioners. Mr. A. Bhattacharyya Ms. Anindita Mukherjee Mr. A. Das …for the Petitioners Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Sanjib Das …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the incident referred to in the present FIR is of 2021. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Having considered the instant complaint is of 2021, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. 2 4. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, 1. Sk Rasidul Islam @ Jwell 2. Raju Sk 3. Azad Rahaman Seikh 4. Sekh Kabir @ Sk Kabir @ Lalan 5. Sekh Momin @ Momin Sk 6. Ganesh Dutta 7. Babar Sekh @ Babar Sk 8. Habibul Mallick be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. As charge-sheet has been submitted this order of anticipatory bail will remain valid for a period of six weeks. 6. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3119 of 2026 is allowed. 7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)