Baiju Chaucdhary @ Baiju Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./92070/2025 · 2026-01-19
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46027 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46027 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.92070 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- Nawalpur District- West Champaran ====================================================== Baiju Chaucdhary @ Baiju Kumar Son of Hiralal Chaudhary Resident of village -Nawalpur Ward No 07, PS -Nawalpur, Distt -West champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Niraj Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Nawalpur P.S. case No. 153 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 18.180 liters liquor was recovered from petitioner’s house. One motorcycle was recovered from the spot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.92070 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 further submitted that local chowkidar disposed the name of the petitioner. The petitioner is not the owner of the motorcycle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nawalpur P.S. case No. 153 of 2025.
Pankaj/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T