RAJ KUMAR GUPTA v. KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
WPA/10305/2025 · 2026-10-05
Raja Basu Chowdhury
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46024 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46024 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ML15 05.10.2026 sayandeep
Ct.3.
WPA 10305 of 2025
Raj Kumar Gupta Versus The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Mr. Sayantan Adhya
… For the petitioner
Mr. Debjit Mukherjee
Ms. Susmita Jana
… For the KMC
Mr. Sanjib Bandyapadhyay
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh
Mr. Pritam Das
Mr. Sanjib Saha
…… for the respondent Nos. 5-6
1. At the time of call, the petitioner is not represented.
2. The municipality has, however, filed a report and would submit that the petitioner has not permitted the private respondent to carryout restoration work of the damaged portion. The report filed by the municipality in Court today is taken on record.
3. Since, at the time of call, the petitioner is not represented, let the writ petition be dismissed for default.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)