Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46022 (PAT)

Ashok Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./90168/2025 · 2026-02-10

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90168 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2022 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ashok Yadav Son of Chamak Yadav Resident of Village- Rampur, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per prosecution case, all 13 F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, armed with lathi and farsa assaulted informant and his family members. It is further alleged that the accused persons also outraged the modesty of female members of the family and snatched gold jewellery. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90168 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/3 behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of long standing land dispute between the parties, a simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against this petitioner. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioner claims clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Benipur in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90168 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 3/3 connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 239 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T