- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18046 CMP No. 212 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO.212 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K.G. KRISHNA S/O LATE GOOLI GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT HALEVOORU ROAD H. DURGA POST AND HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. GODREJ RESERVE LLP FORMERLY KNWON AS M/S SAI SRUSHTI ONEHUB PROJECTS LLP GODREJ ONE 5TH FLOOR, PIROJSHANAGAR EASTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY VIKHROLI EAST MUMBAI-400079 MAHARASTRA REGIOANL OFFICE AT LEVEL 10, PRESTIGE OBELISK KASTURBA ROAD BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNERS. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18046 CMP No. 212 of 2022 1(a). MR. NAYANI SREENADHA REDDY S/O DR. NAYANI JANARDHANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.202 PRESTIGE ABSHOT SANKEY ROAD VASANTHNAGAR BENGALURU-560052. 1(b). GODRAJ PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT LIMITED GODREJ ONE 5TH FLOOR, PIROJSHANAGAR EASTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY VIKHROLI EAST MUMBAI-400079. REPRESENTED BY DESIGNATED NOMINEE MR UDAY BHASKAR KALIGOTA S/O KALIGOTA VENKATESWARA RAO AGED: MAJOR RESIDING AT FLAT NO.20184 PRESTIGE SHANTINIKETAN APARTMENT ITPL MAIN ROAD, ITPL BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560048. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BADRI VISHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1(a); R1(b) SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, READ WITH PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT SCHEME, 1996 PRAYING TO APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR TO DECIDE THE DISPUTE THAT HAS ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18046 CMP No. 212 of 2022 THE RESPONDENT PURSUANT TO THE BREACH OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED 21.12.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner herein has sought for appointment of the Arbitrator based on the Development Agreement dated 21.12.2017(Annexure-A), wherein Clause-11 provides for resolution of the dispute between the parties, by an Arbitrator, under the Provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 3. Sri. Badri Vishal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1(a) placed on record the Order dated 22.08.2022 in Commercial A.A. No.17/2021 on the file of the X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, wherein, the parties have settled the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18046 CMP No. 212 of 2022 dispute, which is forthcoming from paragraph 40 of the Order, and accordingly sought for dismissal of this Petition. 4. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petitioner is placing reliance on Clause 11 of the Development Agreement dated 21.12.2017 (Annexure-A), which is also forthcoming from the settlement between the parties as stated in paragraph 40 of the Order dated 22.08.2022 in Commercial A.A.No.17/2021, referred to above. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in the matter as the parties have settled the dispute. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23