1 D/L 1045 30.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (A) 2573 of 2026 Injamamul Hoque @ Injamul Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Ratua Police Station Case No. 343 of 2025 dated 05.05.2025 under Sections 318(4)/316(2)/336(2)/336(3)/340(2)/61(2)/337/311 of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Injamamul Hoque @ Injamul ……Petitioner. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmad Mr. Sagar Saha …for the Petitioner Mr. L. Vishal Mr. Sanjib Das …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been foisted with the present criminal case and was employed as a ICT School Coordinator. He did not have any overall control of the school affairs and his limited participation was pursuant to the directions of the administration of the school. 2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. I have taken into account the memo of evidence which has been submitted by the learned Advocate appearing for the State. Records reflect that the case is based on documents. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. The 2 complicity of the petitioner has also been assessed by this Court. 4. Having taken into account the overall circumstances and the petitioner willing to participate in the trial, his prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. 5. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Injamamul Hoque @ Injamul be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 6. As charge-sheet has already been submitted this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. 7. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2573 of 2026 is allowed. 8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)