- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7182 WP No. 6363 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 6363 OF 2019 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI H R RANGANATHA S/O RANGASWAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS NO.27, 1ST CROSS 4TH MAIN MUNIKARIYAPPA COMPOUND AGRAHARA DASRAHALLI MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU-560 079 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. L MALLESH .,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE HUDSON CIRCLE BENGALURU-560 002 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE GOVINDARAJANAGARA SUB DIVISION 4TH MAIN ROAD, M C LAYOUT VIJYANAGARA BENGALURU-15 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AMIT DESHAPANDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1-R2) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7182 WP No. 6363 of 2019 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.1.2019 IN MISC.PETITION NO.5/2019 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS NOT GRANTING INTERIM ORDER AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: I. Set aside the order dated 31.01.2019 in Misc. Petition No. 5/2019 marked as Annexure-A is so far as not granting interim order. II. Call for the records, and issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 2 not to demolish the building pending disposal of the Misc. Petition No.5/2019/ Appeal No. 642/2015 in the Hon’ble Karantaka Appellate Tribunal and quash the notice dated 16.01.2019 bearing No. Sa.Ra.Nee.Aa/Goo.Na/P.R/44/2018-19, issued by the R2 marked as Annexure-G III. Pass any other order that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case with cost, in the interest of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7182 WP No. 6363 of 2019 2. A memo dated 5.2.2026 signed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner has been filed, which reads as under:- MEMO I, the undersigned, the advocate for the petitioner submits that the above writ petition has become infructuous since the main petition in Mis. No. 5/2019 before the Karnataka appellate Tribunal itself has been disposed of and hence the above writ petition may kindly be disposed of as become infructuous, in the interests of justice. 3. Accepting the memo and the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8