Sl. No.12. 30.09.2026 Suman Ct. 237 CRR 1478 of 2026 Vishal Das alias Chanti Das alias Putia Vs. The State of West Bengal and Anr. Mr. Pritam Majumdar Mr. Subhajit Purkait ..for the petitioner Mr. Imran Siddiqui ..for the State It appears that a proceeding was initiated against the petitioner under Section 129 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pursuant to Jagaddal Police Station General Diary Entry Nos. 1216 and 1223 dated March 12, 2026, on the basis of a police report submitted before the learned Special Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore Police Commissionerate. Referring to the various orders passed by the learned Magistrate, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being insisted upon to execute the bond by the learned Magistrate without conducting an inquiry under Section 135 of the said Sanhita. Learned advocate appearing for the State disputes the aforesaid allegation. It has been submitted by learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner personally appeared before the learned Magistrate on May 11, 2026. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, no further order is called for in the present revisional application at this stage. Needless to observe that the learned Magistrate shall not insist upon the petitioner executing the bond without completion of the inquiry contemplated under Section 135 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Accordingly, CRR 1478 of 2026 is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.) 2