Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4600 (RAJ)

RAVINDRA SINGH S/O SHRI JAGDISH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4052/2026 · 2026-03-28

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4052/2026 Ravindra Singh S/o Shri Jagdish Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Dhani Biraju Singh Ki Khori, Jaipur Shahpura (Jaipur Rural) Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Bhawani Mandi Dist. Jhalawar). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mitul Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 44/2025 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 of IPC and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 420, 409, 468, 470, 471 of IPC dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is falsely implicated in the matter, and that he is a young man aged about 28 years, who has to take care of his family. It is submitted that the applicant is falsely implicated on pretext of wrongful grant of loan worth Rs.7.19 lacs, while serving as Manager. It is further submitted that the applicant is in custody [2026:RJ-JP:13171] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4052/2026] ever-since 09.02.2026, and that the matter is triable by Magistrate First Class. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that the applicant is falsely implicated in the matter, and that he is a young man aged about 28 years, who has to take care of his family; that on pretext of wrongful grant of loan worth Rs.7.91 lacs, while serving as Manager the applicant is booked; that the applicant is in custody ever-since 09.02.2026; that the matter is triable by Magistrate, but without commenting anything on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ravindra Singh S/o Shri Jagdish Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /33