Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46 (MEG)

PETER ALLAN THOROSE v. DORBAR SHNONG OF CLEVE COLONY REPRESENTED BY THE HEADMAN

Review Pet/3/2026 · 2026-04-02

B Bhattacharjee

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No.01 Supple List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Review Petition No. 3 of 2026 Date of Order: 02.04.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Shri. Peter Allan Thorose, S/o (L) A. Alexander Thorose, R/o St. Peter's School, Cleve Colony, Shillong-793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …..Petitioner. Vs. Dorbar Shnong of Cleve Colony Represented by the Headman, Shri. Wadlihok Jones Nongrum S/o S. K. Jones, R/o Cleve Colony, Shillong-793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …..Respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. D. Thabah, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Thapa, Adv. Mr. S. Khyriem, Adv. 2026:MLHC:292 ORAL:- Heard Mr. D. Thabah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Thapa, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. By this review petition, the petitioner has sought for review of order dated 20.03.2026 passed in CRP No. 4 of 2026. The prime contention raised in this review petition is that CRP No. 4 of 2026 was not maintainable in view of the availability of alternative remedy. The ground raised in this review petition appears to be solely on the question of maintainability. This Court while passing the order dated 20.03.2026 had observed that the learned Trial Court while passing the impugned injunction order did not act in accordance with law and hence, the exercise of supervisory power of this Court was necessary. In view of the above, the ground raised in this review petition has no merit, and the review petition, as such, is rejected. Judge Meghalaya 02.04.2026 “Abhinandan PS” 2026:MLHC:292 Digitally signed by ABHINANDAN KUMAR Date: 2026.04.02 17:39:56 IST